Honda Civic 2007 vs Toyota Corolla 2007
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 201 HP | 124 HP | |
Torque: | 193 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Honda Civic is more dynamic to drive. Honda Civic engine produces 77 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 6.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Civic could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
710 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
500 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Civic engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Auris | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Toyota Corolla engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Toyota Corolla 2007 1.6 engine: This engine is considered one of the most reliable in its class and, with proper maintenance, does not cause major issues for owners. However, its performance is rather modest.
The timing chain has a ... More about Toyota Corolla 2007 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.54 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
Honda Civic is 26 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Civic is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 450 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1350 litres | no data | |
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Civic has 35 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. The Toyota Corolla may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`785 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |