Honda Civic 2001 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Honda Civic engine produces 19 HP more power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Peugeot 206. Despite the higher power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Civic could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Honda Civic is larger. Honda Civic is 64 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 7 cm wider, while the height of Honda Civic is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 992 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity. Honda Civic has 240 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`585 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 206 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |