Honda Civic 2001 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 98 HP | |
Torque: | 152 NM | 150 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
Honda Civic is more dynamic to drive. Honda Civic engine produces 12 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.46 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Honda Civic is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 430 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Honda Civic has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. The Mitsubishi Lancer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
| |