Honda Civic 2001 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is more dynamic to drive. Honda Civic engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi Carisma, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mitsubishi Carisma. Thanks to more power Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.2 | |
| Honda Civic consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
| Honda Civic is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Carisma, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Civic is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 460 litres | |
| Honda Civic has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`630 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |