Honda Civic 2008 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Honda Civic
2008 - 2012
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.3 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 95 HP105 HP
Torque: 123 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 seconds13.1 seconds
Honda Civic engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.67.5
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Honda Civic consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1080 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway910 km on highway
Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 23 years16 years
Engine spread: Used also on Honda InsightUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda Civic might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.46 m
Width: 1.75 m1.76 m
Height: 1.43 m1.47 m
Honda Civic is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Civic is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres340 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1360 litres
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity.
Honda Civic has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6751`785
Safety:
Mazda 3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda Civic scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 42004200
Pros and Cons: Honda Civic has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv