Honda Civic 2025 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Honda Civic engine produces 37 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Mazda CX-30. Despite less power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 5.6 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Civic consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Honda Civic is larger, but lower. Honda Civic is 16 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Civic is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1220 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda Civic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`930 kg | 2`070 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`442 kg | 1`471 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 488 kg | 599 kg | |
| Honda Civic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem less than Mazda CX-30. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |