Honda Civic 2024 vs Ford Kuga 2024
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Honda Civic engine produces 50 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford Kuga. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.2 | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Civic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Civic could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Kuga gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 129 mm (5.1 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Kuga can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Ford Kuga version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda Civic is 5 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 412 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1534 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`800 kg | 2`075 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`339 kg | 1`451 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 461 kg | 624 kg | |
| Honda Civic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem less than Ford Kuga. Therefore, Ford Kuga is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |