Honda Civic 2022 vs Mazda 3 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Honda Civic engine produces 7 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 7.6 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Civic consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Mazda 3 2011 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Honda Civic is larger, but lower. Honda Civic is 9 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Honda Civic is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1220 litres | 1360 litres | |
| Honda Civic has 64 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 140 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`930 kg | 1`835 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`442 kg | 1`285 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 488 kg | 550 kg | |
| Honda Civic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Mazda 3. Therefore, Mazda 3 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |