Honda Civic 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Honda Civic engine produces 25 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Civic consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda Civic is 3 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 389 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Civic has 167 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. This could mean that the Honda Civic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Honda Civic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |