Honda Civic 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Honda Civic engine produces 25 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.2 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Civic consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda Civic is 3 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 389 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda Civic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Honda Civic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`050 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.3/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |