Honda Civic 1997 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 121 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Honda Civic engine produces 16 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Despite less power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.9 | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Civic consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1270 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Honda Civic is 7 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
835 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | low | |
Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |