Honda Civic 2008 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving. Honda Civic engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda Civic consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Honda Civic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Civic consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 310'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Jazz | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Colt, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
| Honda Civic is 32 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Civic is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1190 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Civic has 85 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. The Mitsubishi Lancer may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |