Honda Civic 2017 vs Audi A3 2020
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 182 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Honda Civic is more dynamic to drive. Honda Civic engine produces 32 HP more power than Audi A3, but torque is 30 NM less than Audi A3. Thanks to more power Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
The Audi A3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda Civic consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Civic could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Civic consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Skoda Superb, Audi Q3, Audi A1, Skoda Scala | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Audi A3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
Honda Civic is 18 cm longer than the Audi A3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 380 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1200 litres | |
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity. Honda Civic has 40 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`830 | |
Safety: | |||
Audi A3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda Civic scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 20 200 | 21 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Audi A3 has
| |