Honda Civic 2017 vs Toyota Auris 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 182 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is more dynamic to drive. Honda Civic engine produces 50 HP more power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Toyota Auris. Thanks to more power Honda Civic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda Civic consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Civic could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda Civic consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Auris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda CR-V, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Auris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Auris 2013 1.6 engine: Owners of vehicles with this engine most frequently report excessive oil consumption. The timing chain has a relatively short lifespan, with many owners needing to replace it between 150,000 and 200,000 km. ... More about Toyota Auris 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Honda Civic is larger, but slightly lower. Honda Civic is 24 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda Civic is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 360 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity. Honda Civic has 60 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`790 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Toyota Auris is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda Civic scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | Honda Civic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Auris has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Honda Civic, so Honda Civic quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |