Honda Civic 2001 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.7 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 125 HP | 84 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 153 NM | 122 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | 9 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.0 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Honda Civic is smaller. Honda Civic and Mazda 3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 878 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Honda Civic has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`583 | ~ 1`728 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |