Honda Civic 2001 vs Ford Cougar 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.7 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 125 HP | 130 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 - 153 NM | 176 - 234 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | 7.8 - 10.4 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Cougar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Honda Civic. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.0 | 8.3 - 10.2 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Cougar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Honda Civic is smaller, but higher. Honda Civic is 26 cm shorter than the Ford Cougar, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 441 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Cougar, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`583 kg | ~ 1`799 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`137 kg | ~ 1`371 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 446 kg | ~ 428 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Ford Cougar has
| |