Honda Civic 2008 vs Mazda 3 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 - 201 HP | 105 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 340 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.6 - 15 seconds | 6.1 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.1 | 4.4 - 9.6 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Honda Civic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Honda Civic is 20 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Civic is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1360 litres | |
| Honda Civic has 4 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`732 | ~ 1`856 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Honda Civic scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |