Honda Civic 2012 vs Mazda 3 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 142 HP | 104 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 - 175 NM | 144 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 10.7 seconds | 8 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 6.7 | 3.8 - 6.3 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Honda Civic is smaller. Honda Civic is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda Civic has 21 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.56 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.96 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`680 | ~ 1`846 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda Civic scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |