Honda Civic 1997 vs Toyota Corolla 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 170 HP | 69 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 210 NM | 125 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 14.4 seconds | 10 - 19.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.1 | 5.8 - 8.0 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Honda Civic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Civic is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda Civic is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
835 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`601 | ~ 1`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |