Honda Civic 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.7 | 1.3 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 110 HP | 86 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 - 220 NM | 117 - 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 14.4 seconds | 10.5 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 7.2 | 5.5 - 8.8 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Space Star. On average, Honda Civic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Honda Civic is 23 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Civic is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1050 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`642 | ~ 1`276 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |