Honda Civic 2012 vs Toyota Auris 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 2.2 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 - 150 HP | 90 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 - 350 NM | 128 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | 10 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.3 | 3.8 - 5.9 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Auris. On average, Honda Civic equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Civic is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda Civic is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 477 litres | 360 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage capacity. Honda Civic has 117 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Auris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means Honda Civic can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`822 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda Civic scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |