Honda Civic 2024 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Honda Civic is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-30 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda Civic is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda CX-30 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-30 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 150 HP | 116 - 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 186 NM | 213 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 5.0 | 4.4 - 6.4 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Honda Civic is larger, but lower. Honda Civic is 16 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Civic is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 694 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1220 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Honda Civic has 264 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`860 kg | ~ 1`986 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`459 kg | ~ 1`413 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 401 kg | ~ 573 kg | |
| Honda Civic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 43 procentiem less than Mazda CX-30. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |