Honda Civic 2021 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda Civic is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda CX-30 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-30 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 180 HP | 116 - 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 - 240 NM | 213 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| In general, Honda Civic are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mazda CX-30. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 4.4 - 6.4 | |
|
Honda Civic petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 175 - 180 mm (6.9 - 7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.55 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Honda Civic is larger, but lower. Honda Civic is 15 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Civic is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1220 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-30 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda Civic uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 186 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Civic is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-30. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`930 kg | ~ 1`986 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`442 kg | ~ 1`413 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 488 kg | ~ 573 kg | |
| Honda Civic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem less than Mazda CX-30. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Civic has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |