Honda CRX 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CRX is more dynamic to drive. Honda CRX engine produces 44 HP more power than Toyota Celica, but torque is 4 NM less than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CRX consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Honda CRX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CRX consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 530 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Civic | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 42 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 283 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |