Honda CRX 1992 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
| Honda CRX engine produces 15 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Despite less power, Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CRX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CRX consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Honda CRX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CRX consumes 3.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 520 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 47 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 44 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.8 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |