Honda CRX 1992 vs Mazda MX-3 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CRX is more dynamic to drive. Honda CRX engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Mazda MX-3. Thanks to more power Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CRX consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CRX could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CRX consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.31 m | |
| Honda CRX is 22 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-3, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CRX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda MX-3, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |