Honda CRX 1992 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Honda CRX engine produces 25 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CRX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CRX consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda CRX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CRX consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 52 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 42 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 2.6 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |