Honda CRX 1992 vs Ford Probe 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CRX is more dynamic to drive. Honda CRX engine produces 7 HP more power than Ford Probe, but torque is 28 NM less than Ford Probe. Thanks to more power Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CRX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CRX consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that by driving the Honda CRX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CRX consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Probe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 58 cm shorter than the Ford Probe, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 2 metres less than that of the Ford Probe, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Ford Probe has
| |