Honda CRX 1992 vs Opel Tigra 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 142 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Honda CRX is more dynamic to drive. Honda CRX engine produces 35 HP more power than Opel Tigra, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Opel Tigra. Thanks to more power Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.3 | |
Honda CRX consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Tigra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CRX could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 3.92 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.60 m | |
Height: | 1.26 m | 1.34 m | |
Honda CRX is larger, but lower. Honda CRX is 8 cm longer than the Opel Tigra, 10 cm wider, while the height of Honda CRX is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 425 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.3 metres less than that of the Opel Tigra, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`330 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Opel Tigra has
| |