Honda CRX 1992 vs Honda Civic 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 142 NM | 140 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
Honda CRX is more dynamic to drive. Honda CRX engine produces 20 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CRX consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CRX could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CRX consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
590 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.26 m | 1.38 m | |
Honda CRX is 46 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CRX is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 405 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`550 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Honda Civic has
| |