Honda CRX 1992 vs BMW 3 series 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Honda CRX engine produces 25 HP less power than BMW 3 series, whereas torque is 48 NM less than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Honda CRX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CRX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CRX consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Honda CRX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CRX consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda CRX) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 43 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 435 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |