Honda CRX 1992 vs Volkswagen Corrado 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.8 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 160 HP | 116 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 150 NM | 166 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.5 seconds | 6.9 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 8.1 | 7.6 - 11.5 | |
|
Honda CRX petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Corrado. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.31 m | |
| Honda CRX is 5 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Corrado, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda CRX is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 433 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 821 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Corrado, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`544 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
| |