Honda CRX 1992 vs Volkswagen Vento 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 160 HP | 60 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 150 NM | 116 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.5 seconds | 8 - 18.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 8.1 | 5.0 - 11.6 | |
|
Honda CRX petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Vento. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 38 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Vento, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CRX is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Vento, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`167 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Volkswagen Vento has
| |