Honda CRX 1992 vs Toyota Celica 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Honda CRX is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CRX is available only with front wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 160 HP | 116 - 242 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 150 NM | 154 - 302 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.5 seconds | 6.1 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 8.1 | 7.9 - 9.5 | |
|
Honda CRX petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 42 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 283 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 2 metres less than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`635 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |