Honda CRX 1992 vs Mazda RX-8 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Honda CRX is available with front wheel drive, while Mazda RX-8 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 160 HP | 212 - 232 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 150 NM | 216 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.5 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 8.1 | 12.5 - 12.7 | |
|
Honda CRX petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda RX-8. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 46 cm shorter than the Mazda RX-8, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 290 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mazda RX-8, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`741 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
| |