Honda CRX 1992 vs Kia Optima 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 | 1.8 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 160 HP | 134 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 150 NM | 169 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.5 seconds | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 8.1 | 9.1 - 10.4 | |
|
Honda CRX petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 73 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.2 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
| |