Honda CRX 1992 vs Kia Carens 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Kia Carens is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 160 HP | 140 - 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 150 NM | 192 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 - 10.5 seconds | 11 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 8.1 | 6.2 - 8.4 | |
|
Honda CRX petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Carens. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Honda CRX is smaller. Honda CRX is 55 cm shorter than the Kia Carens, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CRX is 39 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2106 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CRX is 1.4 metres less than that of the Kia Carens, which means Honda CRX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`215 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CRX has
|
Kia Carens has
| |