Ford Tourneo 2010 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Tourneo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Tourneo engine produces 5 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Tourneo is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Tourneo is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2239 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Ford Tourneo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |