Ford Tourneo 2010 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004

 
Ford Tourneo
2010 - 2014
Volkswagen Caddy
2004 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP105 HP
Torque: 220 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.2 seconds13.3 seconds
Volkswagen Caddy is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Tourneo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Due to the lower power, Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.0
Real fuel consumption: 7.0 l/100km7.0 l/100km
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Tourneo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Tourneo could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1150 km on highway
850 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Caddy gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.40 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.98 m1.83 m
Ford Tourneo is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Tourneo is 15 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data560 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2239 litres
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Ford Tourneo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3302`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 64003000
Pros and Cons:
    Volkswagen Caddy has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv