Ford Tourneo 2010 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Volkswagen Caddy is a more dynamic driving. Ford Tourneo engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. Due to the lower power, Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Tourneo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Tourneo could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
850 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Caddy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.98 m | 1.83 m | |
Ford Tourneo is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Tourneo is 15 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 560 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2239 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Ford Tourneo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |