Ford Tourneo 2002 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Tourneo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volkswagen Caddy) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Tourneo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Tourneo engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Volkswagen Caddy. Thanks to more power Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Tourneo consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Ford Tourneo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Tourneo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Tourneo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2004 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Tourneo is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Tourneo is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1400 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3500 litres | 2239 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage capacity. Ford Tourneo has 840 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 1261 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Ford Tourneo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`330 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`545 kg | 1`446 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 785 kg | 554 kg | |
| Ford Tourneo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Volkswagen Caddy. Therefore, Ford Tourneo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |