Ford Tourneo 2010 vs Opel Combo 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 101 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.2 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
Ford Tourneo engine produces 11 HP less power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Opel Combo. Despite less power, Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Tourneo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Tourneo could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Tourneo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
850 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.98 m | 1.80 m | |
Ford Tourneo is larger. Ford Tourneo is 25 cm longer than the Opel Combo, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 18 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Opel Combo, which means Ford Tourneo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 1`990 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Opel Combo has
| |