Ford Tourneo 2022 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Tourneo engine produces 89 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.0 | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Tourneo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Ford Tourneo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eleven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2009 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is smaller, but higher. Ford Tourneo is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 248 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2556 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Ford Tourneo has 247 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 1101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`300 kg | 2`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 47 200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |