Ford Tourneo 2024 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Ford Tourneo) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Volvo XC60) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Tourneo engine produces 87 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Ford Tourneo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 16.6 kWh/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 17.50 $ | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 32 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eleven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2009 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is smaller, but higher. Ford Tourneo is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 248 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2556 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Ford Tourneo has 247 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 1101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Ford Tourneo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`425 kg | 2`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 47 200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |