Ford Tourneo 2022 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Ford Tourneo engine produces 65 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Tourneo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Ford Tourneo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 153 mm (6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is smaller, but higher. Ford Tourneo is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 248 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2556 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Ford Tourneo has 247 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 1101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Ford Tourneo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 47 200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |