Ford Tourneo 2010 vs Opel Combo 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 (diesel) | 1.2 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 110 HP | 70 - 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 250 NM | 125 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 15.2 seconds | 14 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 6.4 | 5.1 - 7.5 | |
|
On average, Ford Tourneo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is larger. Ford Tourneo is 13 cm longer than the Opel Combo, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 610 litres | 455 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage capacity. Ford Tourneo has 155 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.7 metres more than that of the Opel Combo, which means Ford Tourneo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`220 | ~ 1`858 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |