Ford Tourneo 2022 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Ford Tourneo is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 122 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 320 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13.5 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo XC60 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Tourneo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.1 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Ford Tourneo petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Ford Tourneo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 144 - 153 mm (5.7 - 6 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is smaller, but higher. Ford Tourneo is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 248 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2556 litres | 1455 litres | |
| Ford Tourneo has 247 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 1101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Ford Tourneo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`347 kg | ~ 2`499 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`541 kg | ~ 1`814 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 806 kg | ~ 685 kg | |
| Ford Tourneo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Ford Tourneo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 47 200 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |