Ford Tourneo 2022 vs Mini Countryman 2023
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
| Ford Tourneo is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mini Countryman is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid, electric) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol, diesel and hybrid engines. Mini Countryman is available also with electric engines. Electric engines provide instant torque and produce zero tailpipe emissions compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 122 HP | 163 - 313 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 320 NM | 240 - 494 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 13.5 seconds | 5.4 - 8.6 seconds | |
| In general, Mini Countryman are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Tourneo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.1 | 4.8 - 8.3 | |
|
Ford Tourneo petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mini Countryman. On average, Ford Tourneo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Ford Tourneo is larger. Ford Tourneo is 7 cm longer than the Mini Countryman, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Tourneo is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 248 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2556 litres | 1530 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Tourneo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 1026 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Tourneo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Ford Tourneo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`347 kg | ~ 2`309 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`541 kg | ~ 1`749 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 806 kg | ~ 560 kg | |
| Ford Tourneo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem more than Mini Countryman. Therefore, Ford Tourneo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Tourneo has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |