Ford Sierra 1983 vs Audi 100 1986
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Sierra engine produces 22 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Sierra consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Sierra consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Sierra is smaller. Ford Sierra is 30 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`350 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Sierra has
|
Audi 100 has
| |