Ford Sierra 1983 vs Audi 100 1983

 
Ford Sierra
1983 - 1987
Audi 100
1983 - 1988
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.3 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 67 HP69 HP
Torque: 139 NM123 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 20 seconds19.3 seconds
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Sierra engine produces 2 HP less power than Audi 100, but torque is 16 NM more than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.9
Ford Sierra consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that by driving the Ford Sierra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 890 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.79 m
Width: 1.67 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 30 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data644 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1920 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2171`760
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv