Ford Sierra 1983 vs Audi 100 1986

 
Ford Sierra
1983 - 1984
Audi 100
1986 - 1987
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP116 HP
Torque: 150 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.9 seconds10.9 seconds
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Sierra engine produces 26 HP less power than Audi 100, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Audi 100. Due to the lower power, Ford Sierra reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.59.1
Ford Sierra consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Sierra could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.79 m
Width: 1.67 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
Ford Sierra is smaller.
Ford Sierra is 30 cm shorter than the Audi 100, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Sierra is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 1073 litres644 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1920 litres
Ford Sierra has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Ford Sierra has 429 litres more trunk space than the Audi 100. The Audi 100 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Sierra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Ford Sierra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1551`840
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data1200
Pros and Cons: Ford Sierra has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 100 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv